23 Of The Best Divorce Books For Healing, Support, And Guidance

23 Of The Best Divorce Books For Healing, Support, And Guidance Youve done therapy, youve (hopefully) talked about your feelings together. Your relationship is over, one way or another, and theres only one thing left to deal with: your marriage. Amicable or not, youll need to cut those ties that bind before you get  on with living your best life. For that, youll need some sage advice from the best divorce books out there. Heres a reading list to get you started. (Afterward, head over and check out our best feminist divorcée reads!) Most of the divorce literature out there seems to be geared toward women. Furthermore, it appears to be dominated by white authors writing to the concerns of white communities. While I only found a few authors of color writing about this topic, I hope there are more. I included those that I could find on this list. Likewise, theres almost nothing current about LGBTQ divorce. Im going to go ahead and assume that its just because were so blamed awesome. Otherwise, it means that same-sex marriage hasnt been legal long enough to spawn a niche rainbow divorce industry. These books are all geared toward adults whose relationship has dissolved, is dissolving, or really ought to dissolve. If you need to talk to kids about divorce, we have a reading list for that, too. Teens might want to read on their own. Weve got that covered, too. Divorce Books With Guidance and Advice 1. The African-American Guide to Divorce Drama: Breaking Up Without Breaking Down  by Lester L. Barclay The author of this book is a matrimonial lawyer. He covers the particular considerations of divorce in the Black community, including social, familial, personal, and legal aspects. 2. The Breakup Bible: The Smart Womans Guide to Healing from a Breakup or Divorce  by Rachel Sussman This book, authored by a mental health counselor, provides you with resources for moving past your divorce emotionally. That said, it also touches upon topics like co-parenting with your ex in an emotionally healthy way. Its most helpful if you were the dumpee rather than the dumper. 3. Conscious Uncoupling: 5 Steps to Living Happily Even After  by Katherine Woodward Thomas A lot of books about emotionally handling divorce focus on women. Not this book! There are pearls of wisdom here for everybody. Its particularly good at helping you identify your relationship patterns. Like our previous book, this one stresses the well-being of any children that you and your ex might have together. 4. Fair Share Divorce for Women: The Definitive Guide to Creating a Winning Solution  by Kathleen A. Miller Lets face it: your divorce is going to get financially sticky. This book contains some solid advice from a CPA who knows her way around a settlement. As the title suggests, this book is most relevant to women. 5. Getting Past Your Breakup: How to Turn a Devastating Loss into the Best Thing That Ever Happened to You by Susan J. Elliott If youve ever been in a breakup before, then you already know how hard it is to stop texting, calling, and otherwise contacting the person in whose life you were intimately entangled. If youre struggling to detach, Susan Elliot might have some good advice for you. 6. Its Called A Breakup Because Its Broken: The Smart Girls Break-Up Buddy by Greg Behrendt and Amiira Ruotola The author of Hes Just Not That Into You and his wife want you to throw that pity party. Feel your feelings! Then, seek clarity about your relationship and its true relationship to your happiness. Not everything needs to be fixed. Theres some tough love here, but funny anecdotes take the sting out. 7. Sacred Cows: The Truth About Divorce and Marriage by Danielle Teller and Astro Teller There are a lot of myths about divorce out there. The Tellers, a married pair themselves, explode a lot of them in this book. A playful tone lightens the heavy subject matter somewhat. 8. Splitting: Protecting Yourself While Divorcing Someone with Borderline or Narcissistic Personality Disorder  by Randi Kreger and Bill Eddy Whether or not your ex has been formally diagnosed, this book has some good advice for breaking up with high-conflict people. If you worry about your spouses reaction to a divorce request, this might be a good book to review before you broach the subject. 9. The Storms Cant Hurt the Sky: The Buddhist Path through Divorce by Gabriel Cohen Mixing memoir with advice, this is a unique guide to spiritual balance during tough times. Bonus: Cohen recommends several other useful books about Buddhism for readers who want to explore further. 10. Too Good to Leave, Too Bad to Stay: A Step-by-Step Guide to Help You Decide Whether to Stay In or Get Out of Your Relationship by Mira Kirschenbaum Its not unusual to teeter on the brink of divorce, sometimes for years. If this is your situation, do yourself the favor of reading this book. Its a neutral tool for relationship assessment, but can give you the validation you need to make a decision if youre wavering. 11. Uncoupling: How to Survive and Thrive After Breakup and Divorce by Sara Davison Heres a book that will normalize the many challenges of divorce for people who are feeling unsure about whats normal. Davison is a life coach who draws in part upon her own divorce for reference. Divorce Books About Parenting 12. Parenting through Divorce: Helping Your Children Thrive During and After the Split  by Lisa Rene Reynolds, PhD There are a few reactions that you can probably expect from your kids when you announce your divorce. The object of this book is to prepare you to handle those in a healthy way. 13. A Parents Guide to Divorce: How to Raise Happy, Resilient Kids Through Turbulent Times  by Karen Becker Addressing the needs of all age groups, this book is particularly good at addressing specifics. For example, it gives good tips about handling holidays. 14. Talking to Children About Divorce: A Parents Guide to Healthy Communication at Each Stage of Divorce by Jean McBride Any parent who is in the process of divorcing needs to be ready to field questions and head off misconceptions that their kids might or might not voice. A lot of the communication advice in this book could also apply to other difficult conversations. Divorce Memoirs 15. Aftermath: On Marriage and Separation by Rachel Cusk Cusk struggled when her marriage of ten years fell apart. She presents herself with all of her flaws intact in this memoir of divorce and motherhood. 16. A Beautiful, Terrible Thing by Jen Waite Upon discovering that her husband has been massively unfaithful, Waite embarks upon the difficult process of emotionally recovering and escaping from her marriage. 17. Falling Apart in One Piece: One Optimists Journey Through the Hell of Divorce by Stacy Morrison Morrisons husband walked out when she least expected it, leaving her with a new house, a new baby, and a new perspective on life. 18. Happens Every Day: An All-Too-True Story  by Isabel Gillies With candid honesty, Gillies discusses the sacrifices she made for a marriage that quickly fell apart. This book avoids self-pity in favor of mindful positivity. 19. How Divorce Became My Deliverance, edited by Elona Washington This collection of essays by divorced Black women offers a positive long view on separation. Its an encouraging collection edited by a prominent publisher and guest blogger for Huffpost. 20. How to Sleep Alone in a King-Size Bed: A Memoir of Starting Over by Theo Pauline Nestor Divorce pushed Nestor out of her stable middle-class existence and into single motherhood. After throwing out her gambling-addicted husband, she finds the way forward by exploring her familys past, while keeping her children foremost in her mind. 21. I Am Nujood, Age 10 And Divorced by Nujood Ali Nujoods experience departs significantly from the others on this list. A child bride to an abuser in Yemen, she obtained her freedom after a heartbreaking struggle. 22. Split: A Memoir Of Divorce by Suzanne Finnamore Ignoring signs of her husbands infidelity didnt save Finnamores marriage. However, moving on from her subsequent divorce did make her a stronger person. 23. Were Still Family: What Grown Children Have to Say About Their Parents Divorce  by Constance Ahrons The specter of ruined childhood haunts many divorcees, but it might not be entirely valid. This collection of short essays by the children of divorce suggests not only that positive outcomes are possible, but that kids can join their parents in moving through divorce resiliently. Hit the comments to share your picks for the best divorce books.

Spanish Verbs Meaning to Begin

Spanish has two everyday verbs that can be used for to begin or to start: empezar and comenzar. They usually can be used interchangeably. Although empezar is more common than comenzar, comenzar doesnt come across as conspicuously formal like its English cognate, commence. Both empezar and comenzar are conjugated irregularly. Correct Way to Use Empezar and Comenzar To say to begin to do something, you can use either of the verbs followed by the preposition a and an infinitive: El web empieza a generar dinero. The website is beginning to generate money. ¿A quà © hora empezà ³ a nevar? At what time did it begin to snow?Cuando llegamos a Quito, comenzaba a llover. When we arrived at Quito, it was beginning to rain.Uruguay comienza a estudiar la produccià ³n de energà ­a nuclear. Uruguay is beginning to study the production of nuclear energy.Empiezo a pensar por ti mismo. I am beginning to think just like you.La inflacià ³n va a empezar muy pronto a bajar. Inflation is going to begin to drop very soon. Each verb can stand by itself without an object: La lluvia empieza a caer mà ¡s y mà ¡s fuerte. The rain is beginning to fall harder and harder.El mitin comenzà ³ finalmente a las 10 de la noche. The meeting finally began at 10 p.m.Bueno, pues sà ­, empezamos con esto. Good, then, lets get started with it. (Literally, with this.)La boda comenzarà ¡ a las 12:30 hora local. The wedding will begin at 12:30 local time. When either verb is followed by a gerund, it often has the meaning of to begin by or to start out: Empezà ³ estudiando en el taller del escultor famoso. She started out studying in the famous sculptors studio.Comencà © trabajando 10 horas por dà ­a como limpiadora de casa. I started out working 10 hours per day as a housecleaner.Empezamos corriendo juntos el primer kilà ³metro. We begin by running the first kilometer together. Although probably not as common as in English, the two verbs can also take direct objects to indicate what is getting started: Tiene muchos consejillos para comenzar un negocio. He has many tips for starting a business.La ciudad empezà ³ la reparacià ³n de la calles en abril. The city began the street repairs in April. Other Verbs for To Begin As just shown, you often can use the verbs to refer to beginning an activity with the activity as the object of the verb. But it is also common to use the verb emprender for that purpose. Emprender is especially common when referring to the beginning of travel. No quiere emprender la tarea sin ayuda. He doesnt want to do the task without help.Dentro de unos minutos emprendo el viaje. Within a few minutes I begin the trip.Emprendieron el reto de construir un proyecto conjunto. They began the challenge of building a project together.Emprendà ­ el vuelo en direccià ³n hacia donde el sol se pone. I began the flight in the direction of the sunset. The verb originarse often translates to begin when it is used to mean to originate: El problema se originaba cuando navegaba ciertas pà ¡ginas web. The problem started when I was going to certain web pages.La crisis econà ³mica mundial se originà ³ en EEUU. The world economic crisis began in the U.S. Use of Verb Tense To Indicate Beginning Often, when speaking of events in the past, the preterite tense is used in preference to the imperfect to indicate that an activity began. A form of begin isnt necessarily used in translation, however. A common example is the verb conocer, which often means to know a person. The difference between Conocà ­a a Katrina and Conocà ­ a Katrina is roughly the difference between I knew Katrina and I began to know Katrina. Typically, the second sentence would be translated as I met Katrina. Other examples: Yo tenà ­a calor. (I was warm.) Tuve calor. (I began to be warm. I got warm.)Ella sabà ­a la verdad. (She knew the truth.) Supo la verdad. (She began knowing the truth. She found out the truth.) This concept is further explained in the lesson on using the past tense with certain verbs.

Film Analysis Slacker 1991 - 1188 Words

â€Å"Slacker† (1991) is an independent film by director â€Å"Richard Linklater†. Its a character-based fiction, structured with many individual scenes forming a feature film without an apparent narrative. The film is portraying bits of everyday life of several eccentric people in Austin, Texas. The film is built up in a way that every scene presents new characters, and after the scene is over you will never see the same characters again. The camera floats from scene to scene by following different characters from one location to another. Like normal three-act-structured films, â€Å"Slacker† has no protagonist to lead a plot line. Its therefore no plot to connect the scenes to each other, creating many individual scenes with their own†¦show more content†¦He is constantly talking to the driver about his thoughts of alternate realities. â€Å"Its like every decision you make... the thing you choose not to do, fractions off and becomes its own reality, you know...† This scene is held in only one shot of both Linklaters character and the cabdriver. Linklater is continuously talking about one subject throughout the drive. And because the scene is never cut to a close-up or escalates through editing, I feel like we are never introduced to something within the character, unlike films with a more apparent narrative. In a conventional three-act-structured film, the scenes are often built up differently. I have chosen a scene from George Clooneys â€Å"The Ides of March (2011)†. The editing pattern of this scene is rather common. It starts of with an establishing shot of the characters in the scene. In this case, this shot is held until the conversation starts being personal. As the scene escalates and intensifies the scene is cut into ultra close-ups of both the characters. In this case the scene is never cut back to the establishing shot, which often is the case. â€Å"The Place Beyond The Pines† Is a feature film by Derek Cianfrance. The storyline is linear, but focuses on different protagonists throughout the film. It starts off with one main character, who has his own narrative. Later in the film we are introduced toShow MoreRelatedMe and You and Memento and Fargo by J.J. Murphy1640 Words   |  7 Pagesnarrative is vital, whether it be in films, books, theatre, etc. It is a frame for a story to work within. While there is a traditional method and formula to structuring a film narrative, filmmakers all over the world have experimented with breaking the norm and trying new ways to structure a film. It tested the viewer’s notion of what structure is and how a narrative can be told. It was also new and something that audiences were not used to. Even now, a film that moves too far away from theRead More Capitalism, Marketing, and the Insidious and Covert Co-optation of the Self6482 Words   |  26 Pageshappen. The transaction is not complete until the reality of bifurcation has been erased or denied to the subject, victim, or consumer. It is not just the abuse that destroys the consciousness, but the denial. The inversion of surveillance (Halleck, 1991) of popular video that occurred when civilian George Halliday turned his camcorder on the LAPD as they beat Rodney King represents the overturning of this denial. As Kings writhing brown body was broadcast internationally via cable and satellite transmissionsRead MoreMonsanto: Better Living Through Genetic Engineering96204 Words   |  385 Pages441 441 CASE STUDIES A summary of the case analysis I N T R O D U C T I O N Preparing an effective case analysis: The full story Hearing with the aid of implanted technology: The case of Cochlearâ„ ¢ – an Australian C A S E O N E high-technology leader Delta Faucet: Global entrepreneurship in an emerging market C A S E T W O DaimlerChrysler: Corporate governance dynamics in a global company C A S E T H R E E Gunns and the greens: Governance issues in Tasmania C A S E F O U R Succeeding in the

Career Interest Profile Free Essays

My impenitence of researching, straightening, coping with pressure, applying expertise, logical thinking, and leading are consistent with my profile. The researching means I have the ability to get up to speed quickly when presented with new information and tasks. It allows me to support my opinions with evidence. We will write a custom essay sample on Career Interest Profile or any similar topic only for you Order Now My ability to produce focused and detailed plans while ensuring I see the big picture are in agreement with straightening. M very comfortable with data, identifying patterns, and getting to the root cause f problems by asking the right questions that support my logical thinking. Applying expertise is my understanding of how things work and the capability to effectively implement the use of every tool at my disposal in order to get things done more efficiently. Coping with pressure simply means I can stay on task and be positive through any situation. Together, all the competencies I have described support my capacity of leading. I enjoy coaching mentoring, ND developing individuals by providing clear direction, purpose, and motivation. My work culture preferences are high powered, teamwork centered, and ethical. These correlate to my career interests and competencies in many ways. The teamwork centered culture requires working in a close knit team which is interconnected with enterprising and social individuals with most if not all my competencies. In addition, the ethical preference relates to leading by setting the appropriate standards of behaviors. How to cite Career Interest Profile, Papers

RE If Atheists Ruled The World Essays - Irreligion, Secularism

This is a response to the video 'If Atheists ruled the world' at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO9IPoAdct8&feature=relate It was one of the funniest, albeit most frustrating and most ignorant videos I have ever watched. Now to correct/explain the video. If anyone disagrees with me feel free to reply. Ok, the first guy talks about atheists blindly accepting evolution without questioning it. We are given evidence and explanation to how it happened and why it happened. Religion on the other hand has a book as evidence, and christians are told everything they know about creationism, without proper evidence or explanation and ignorantly agree. ?I know he did it? is the same attitude which he is arguing against. Flaaaaawed. The second guy sums it up in ?3 words?. ?Evolution is a lie?. Need I say more? Third guy doesn?t care that he doesn?t know anything about evolution. He just ?knows? that he?s correct. Again, another ignorant dumbass not bothering to check the facts, too scared to deal with reality and simply rejects what he doesn?t want to agree with. Back to the first guy, now talking about scientists ?making up? complex terminology for the pure function of making it harder for Christians to refute their claims. Now that is just stupid. Scientists deal with a lot more than just the theory of evolution and do not randomly make up words for the sake of arguing. When he?s talking about the acid, he is just being moronic. Of course if we had acid in our veins we would not survive, but how does that disprove the theory of evolution? It doesn?t. Guy number three now butts in saying that we evolved from monkeys. Check the facts, fool. Science doesn?t say that at all. That?s just a popular simplification from the people who have fewer brain cells than a pineapple. And as with the ?why aren?t babies born as monkeys? part, I have to slap my forehead. Again, read some actual information about evolution before you argue with such idiotic questions. Second guy again. If religion did not exist, of course there would still be war, just not as much. Religion has caused the most deaths in history. The Islam to this day are taught that people should be killed because they are of a different or of no religion. Christians are known for massacre on a huge scale during the Crusades. Killing people, burning people, nailing people to crosses, because they believe something else? Without hiding behind the cover of religion it would be considered insanity and murder in the highest degree. The guy on the video also says the world would be more violent without religion because they are afraid of God?s wrath. No. The majority of people nowadays obey laws of killing because they are either afraid of the punishment or consequence of their actions, or have morals. If the reason behind not killing people is solely because of God, he should be in a mental home. Does God change? Because from what I heard, God used to tell Christians to kill and conqu er in his name. Back to the guy who looks like a stupid version of Jesus; Darwin may have stated that his theory could be wrong. It could be. We don?t know everything about our history as a race, but there is much more evidence supporting evolutionism as opposed to creationism. Beanie guy again. God didn?t create oil deposits. God didn?t create anything. He doesn?t exist. BUT if he did, why would I want to belong to a religious group that follows a God that sends people to Hell for an eternity of torture and suffering just because solid evidence is more convincing than an old book and a bunch of folk tales? So don?t look all smug just yet, Mr. Beanie. To be honest, I laughed out loud at the pure stupidity of the Jesus-looking guy. Was he dropped as a child? Oh wait. He was thrown at a wall. No of course, Mr. Simpleton, monkeys don?t live millions of years. You must be right, god does exist. Does he have an IQ of 20 or something? The nerdy looking Christian now goes on to explain that Mouse DNA is more similar to humans than human DNA.

Socrates and Matthew Essays

Socrates and Matthew Essays Socrates and Matthew Essay Socrates and Matthew Essay Every ancient culture seemed to have its own heretics. The Greeks and Romans were no exception. In Athens, Greece, the philosopher Socrates was perhaps the most well-known heretic, and in Rome it was Jesus of Nazareth. Both Socrates and Jesus faced political charges. However, Socrates was more of a political man than Jesus was.First, there was evidence suggesting that Socrates may have committed political crimes in Athens. Athens was an ancient Democracy, and freedom of speech was highly prized in the courts and among the common people. However, Socrates was executed despite the existence of this freedom. This implies that he tried to overthrow the democracy and begin a dictatorship. According to I. F. Stone, anti-democrats established short dictatorships in 411 B.C. and 404 B.C. Because Socrates was also a well-known anti-democrat, Athenians were afraid of another dictatorship. For this reason, Socrates was not put on trial until 399 B.C. after he had been teaching for more than 25 years, even though he was already an old man (Stone).On the other hand, Jesus was not accused of trying to overthrow the government. Instead, Judas Iscariot, one of his 12 disciples, brought Jesus to the chief priests to be crucified, in exchange for 30 pieces of silver (Matthew 26.14-15 King James Version). As a result, he was crucified, even though no specific political charges were brought against him.No one ever revoked Socratess charges. But Judas did try to revoke his bribe to crucify Jesus. In Matthew 27:4, Judas said: I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood. But in the same verse, the people did not want to hear what he had to say; their response was: What is that to us? See thou to that (Matthew 27.4).However, both Socrates and Jesus faced religious charges. For Socrates the charge was corrupting the youth, although no specific definition or explanation of the charge â€Å"Socrates and Matthew† was ever given. According to Stone, however, it may have referred to the possibility that Socrates was undermining young Athenians faith in their democracy (Stone). Jesuss charge was blasphemy, because he claimed to be the king of the Jews (Matthew 27.11). However, the governor did not recognize any evil in him (Matthew 27.23). In the end, Jesus was crucified, because the people demanded it and took responsibility for his crucifixion (Matthew 27.25).Another difference between Socrates and Jesus was the justification of each verdict. In the book of Matthew, there were no references to people feeling justified long after the crucifixion of Jesus. However, more than 50 years after the trial of Socrates, the Greek orator Aeschines said: Men of Athens, you executed Socrates, the sophist, because he was clearly responsible for the education of Critias, one of the thirty anti-democratic leaders (qtd. in Stone). This quote proves that if Socrates had not been executed, yet another dictatorship could have been established in the democratic city o f Athens. It is also interesting to note that Socrates never left Athens during the reign of the 30 tyrants, who were all dictators. It was as if he were overseeing their work, and he was one of very few people who were not banished, put into exile, or murdered for not supporting the 30 tyrants (Stone).As a matter of fact, the only reference to how people felt after the crucifixion of Jesus was one of remorse. Matthew 27:54 reads: Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.In addition, Jesus was not accused of corrupting the youth, as Socrates was. In contrast, Xenophon, a witness at the trial of Socrates, later reported that during the trial, â€Å"Socrates and Matthew†   someone accused Socrates of teaching people to despise the way minor government offices were filled by lot. This unnamed accuser also said that Socrates taught his pupi ls that the government should be run by experts, rather than by popular vote in the assembly (Stone). Although Xenophon was a follower of Socrates, he did not deny these accusations. Furthermore, he later stated that Socrates was accused of corrupting the young by teaching them the things previously mentioned (Stone). Xenophon denied this charge, but it is, nonetheless, a charge and an accusation. This, along with the fact that he did not deny the first two charges, proves that Socrates was an extremely political man.There are other political reasons for the condemnation of Socrates. According to Stone, Athens granted amnesty toward the 30 tyrants, as long as they stopped being dictators. After this, their past actions were not brought up again, and Athenians kept their oath and acted honorably toward the former tyrants (Stone). However, Socrates was prosecuted and condemned, because he continued teaching his anti-democratic philosophy even after the democracy was re-established (St one). Jesus, on the other hand, was not accused of being a dictator, and there was no evidence to suggest that he continued teaching after receiving a warning like Socrates did after the Athenian democracy was rebuilt.In conclusion, Socrates was more of a political man than Jesus of Nazareth. Although there is no record of the entire trial, there is enough evidence, if not to justify the condemnation of Socrates, then certainly to conclude that he was much more political than Jesus was. This evidence includes the fact that Xenophon did not deny the charges that Socrates did not agree with how the Athenian government was run, and that Socrates â€Å"Socrates and Matthew† continued his anti-democratic teachings after the re-establishment of the Greek democracy.

The Right Prepositions for Geographical Designations

The Right Prepositions for Geographical Designations The Right Prepositions for Geographical Designations The Right Prepositions for Geographical Designations By Mark Nichol The idiomatic idiosyncrasies among references to one’s relationship to geographical or topographical features make selecting the correct preposition a challenge for nonnative speakers, but even those born to English can stumble. This post discusses various classes of phrasing about location. One lives in a town or city, county, state, or nation but on a continent. One writes of one’s residence in a neighborhood or district, but a reference to a side of a city (Chicago’s North Side or New York City’s East Side, for example) is oriented with on. If one lives virtually or literally in the shadow of an imposing natural or artificial edifice, however, one might say that one lives beneath Telegraph Hill or works under the Gateway Arch. If one is referring to some point past one’s current location or another reference point, one might say that the place in question is, for example, below Broadway, even though no change in altitude is involved. In topographical contexts, the preposition depends on the position: One lives in the foothills or in the mountains, even though, presumably, one is not a cave dweller, or in a canyon or valley. But one lives, or stands, on the hillside or mountainside or on the hilltop or the mountaintop or on the valley floor. These distinctions apply to proper names, too: One vacations in the Catskills or backpacks in the Rockies, but one stands on Spyglass Hill (though one can either hike on or up it). One drives on or along a street, road, or highway, but one takes a turn at an intersection or exits at (or onto) an off-ramp. â€Å"In the sea† and â€Å"under the sea† refer to being or traveling beneath the surface of the ocean. However, on, just as on land, is the correct preposition for references to surface travel, though one might also refer to coursing along or over a sea route. One also moves on, along, or over a lake or another body of water, although on also applies to one’s position in reference to a coast, shoreline, or bank, as when visiting friends who live on the ocean, staying at a campsite on a lake, or having a house on a river. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the General category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Congratulations on or for?50 Types of PropagandaTypes of Ignorance